Exactly What Is 9-11 Disinformation Seven Years After 9-11-01?

DISCLAIMER
Actions Or Words?
Misinfo as Disinfo
How Many Floor Plans?
Loose Change

Fake Plans

DISINFO conclusion
Internet Forums and Disinfo
DISINFO Site map.
Quasi Psych
Back to The Demo
NUKEs
Richard Gage
Judy Wood
Steven Jones

Fake Plans

Loose Change, Alex Jones,
We Are Change
rense.com
Jim Fetzer
NYCCAN
breakfornews.com
david.icke.com
JREF.org
pilotsfor911truth.org
myspace .com
War On You
Misc. Forums Richard Dawkins

This page was supposed to be a thread on the "Signs of the Times Forum" forum located

http://signs-of-the-times.org/signs/forum/viewforum.php?id=38

Thread url

.http://signs-of-the-times.org/signs/forum/viewtopic.php?id=4195

BUT, a very strange performance from technological manipulation of servers interactions with web browsers prevented my posting the thread. So, .... instead I made this page and link to another page having screen shots documenting the browser performance which caused me to make this page.

What was to be the thread title at "Signs of the Times Forum"

Why Is It So Important That The WTC Twin Towers DID NOT Have A Concrete Core?

Herein you will find the most convoluted issue of 9-11 that is in existence.

Pay careful attention to the psychology presented here it details the impersonation of quasi psychological deception and manipulation.

Why the disproportionate attention to dismissing the information/evidence documenting the concrete core of the Twin Towers?

I have been battling for years against an invisible army of web entities that have a mandate with a totally unexplained focus, that the Twin Towers DO NOT HAVE A CONCRETE CORE. Literally, if I ask why it is so important, there is no answer.

These tireless, endless stream of entities with what appears as huge passion battle the completely sensible notion that the most common building material in the world was used to form a steel reinforced cast concrete tube at the center of the towers. Some of them even claim to be seeking the truth and say things like "The evidence shows the official story cannot be true. It must have been a demolition." Then, ........ two threads away in my thread about the concrete core they say, "There is absolutely no evidence for the concrete core." and they totally cite FEMA and NIST data or all the others that use that data while saying things like,, "It is a well established fact that the towers had 47, 1,300 foot steel core columns."

They do this with almost no raw evidence whatsoever while copious evidence from raw images absolutely show materials in positions that cannot be anything but concrete. The same images NEVER show the steel core columns where they absolutely should be seen. I have built an entire web site of these images and other statements as evidence from various uninterested parties and placed in on the web for the 9-11 movement to refer to. I've challenged these dismissers of the concrete core to make web sites using raw evidence of images from the demo to show steel core columns which totally exposes all the major structural elements of the towers at one phase or another, but they never build a site that focuses on the steel core compiling competent evidence which is consistent with the images of the demolition. The reason why is that it is STRICTLY impossible to do so. No image shows steel core columns. Only by misrepresentation can this be even simulated

What they do instead is build a site that has the name "no concrete core" in its url.

Trying to debunk my site

http://concretecore.741.com

Which was replaced with

http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html

After UniversalSeed.org mailed me saying that the 741.com had too many pop ups

From: Real Truth RealTruth@UniversalSeed.org

Subject:

the concrete core has too many popups and windows

.

Now, keep in mind that I built the http://concretecore.741.com site to totally separate my demo site from the concrete core presentation because I figured that anybody working against demolition that ACTUALLY KNEW the true methods, C4 coated rebar inside of cast concrete, would fight tooth and nail against the concrete core. The fact that I don't identify myself on the concretecore.741.com site became an issue on loosechange.com and randi,org by posters who claimed to be pro demolition. Supporting an impossible demolition is safe for them because of the strawman factor of steel core columns and what it takes to cut them. That event changes the entire visual and auditory character of the recorded event in order to get the uniform steel box columns left at ground zero.

The http://noconcretecore.741.com/ site is created by posters at .randi.org forum in the thread I started there,

Which on 11/27/06 had 126,578 views and 8,535 post of which about 1,950 are mine.

You will find remarkable efforts to move my information off the last page of that thread. The page most often viewed by visitors. There are pages of posts of baking recipes and pictures of cats. Verses of 99 bottles of beer on the walls and endless criticism of the rational, evidenced proposal that the towers had a steel reinforced cast concrete core.

Finally, on this page they go to the point of character assassination,

http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?postid=2127545#post2127545

Where a poster has created a video to ridicule me and my efforts. Copying screen shots of my demolition site,

http://www.youtube.com/v/ZYPco_Pr5Sw&autoplay=1

I consider this a convoluted victory. I have owned the thread so long with simple, irrefutable evidence that they must return over and over to try and dismiss it, wherein they finally see that they've failed, and so resort to utter abandon with an hominum attack that is excessive.

The same poster has a collection of inane distortions of my site as a copy.

CHOCOLATE CORE

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/cozyhill/index.html

Here is a recent post and the reply I did not post THERE at randi.org, to it. I post it here.

chippy

I have never seen a post with more than 8,000 responses. Wow. I guess this means that someone has seen a realistic explanation of the free fall of the towers, eh?

My reply

See the "What is 9-11 Disinfo?" pages at my site.

And realize that if we do not stand behind something substantially explanatory for 9-11, the public will loose interest and dismiss the quest for 9-11 truth as nonsense proposals such as beam weapons and mini nukes start to dominate.

Absolutely the best approach in existence for the elected officials and other notables/authorities that ARE ON OUR SIDE is the concrete core because it is a simple lie that if exposed will dispense COMPLETELY with the FEMA WTC report and the NIST report making it absolutely needed to create a new investigation.

Realize that if we do not stand behind something substantially explanatory for 9-11, the public will loose interest and dismiss the quest for 9-11 truth as nonsense proposals such as beam weapons and mini nukes start to dominate.

Absolutely the best approach in existence for the elected officials and other notables/authorities that ARE ON OUR SIDE is the concrete core because it is a simple lie that if exposed will dispense COMPLETELY with the FEMA WTC report and the NIST report making it absolutely needed to create a new investigation.

So, if you are sincere in seeking 9-11 truth, make up your mind NOW, because if you do not the truth movement is going to fade. It already is.

I recommend taking direct action in writing about the FEMA "core lie" with snail mail, certified return is best to any or all of the following

Senator Max Cleland Former member of the 9/11 Commission, resigned in December 2003. Currently serves on the board of directors of the Export-Import Bank of the United States. U.S. Senator from Georgia 1996 - 2002. Secretary of State of Georgia 1982 - 1996. Administrator of the U.S. Veterans Administration 1977 - 1981. Captain, U.S. Army awarded Silver Star and Bronze Star for bravery in Viet Nam. Triple amputee from war injuries

Senator Bob Graham Former U.S. Senator from Florida 1987 - 2005. Former Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee. Co-Chairman of the Joint House-Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (JICI) that investigated the events of 9/11. Former Governor of Florida 1979 - 1986

Senator Mark Dayton Senate Committee on Armed Services, Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Services.

U.S. Senator from Minnesota.

Edward L. Peck Deputy Director of the White House Task Force on Terrorism under Ronald Reagan. Former Deputy Coordinator, Covert Intelligence Programs at the State Department. U.S. Ambassador and Chief of Mission to Iraq (1977 - 1980). 32-year veteran of the Foreign Service

Paul Craig Roberts, PhD Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury under Ronald Reagan, "Father of Reaganomics", Former Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal. Currently Chairman of the Institute for Political Economy and Research Fellow at the independent institute.

Col. Ronald D. Ray, U.S. Marine Corps (ret) Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense during the Reagan Administration and a highly decorated Vietnam veteran (two Silver Stars, a Bronze Star and a Purple Heart). Appointed by President George H.W. Bush to serve on the American Battle Monuments Commission (1990 - 1994), and on the 1992 Presidential Commission on the Assignment of Women in the Armed Forces. From 1990 through 1994, he served as Military Historian and Deputy Director of Field Operations for the U.S. Marine Corps Historical Center, Washington, D.C.

Capt. Russ Wittenberg, U.S. Air Force Former Air Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions. Commercial pilot for Pan Am and United Airlines

Cynthia Mckinney http://www.congress.org/congressorg/bio/?id=193

John Conyers http://www.house.gov/conyers/

Back To The Scenario

Feedback to; elanuslecurus@lycos.com

The FEMA Deception
The Psyops, Disinfo & Misinformation
The Twin Towers Design & Construction
The Demolition