"NO PLANE THEORY"
A theory presented as being very important on 9-11 message boards that also has some kind of a vague, preemptive value. Or, "If there were no planes, then none of it is true." Accordingly, all energy by the NPT people is subsequently directed to convincing Americans there "were no planes". The real effect of this is that non "9-11 truth persons", laugh, and effectively dissociate the maximum amount of information relating to 9-11 truth.
The ability for the NPT to be as effective as it is because of the void or vacuum created by the nonsense structural information of the steel core columns. The entire thing becomes impossible. No one is able to explain the event with the information they are given. If they are inclined to like the concept of "no war" and "constitutional government" "or conspiracies" and someone appearing as an authority says, "There were no planes", and your friends all have seen a video that implies that because "video can be faked, video was faked". then, a person is shown a fake video and they might join in the belief system that says, "there were no planes."
There is a logical method of showing that the NPT theory is a trojan horse not reasonable to trust in. The NPT totally relies on remote control over something, at least explosive detonators. Some NPT people think there were no planes or anything, just holograms, and explosives were planted that did all the rest. Some think holograms covered missiles or drones. All of those things REQUIRE remote control.
The entire reason for remote control is to create options and make a more credible scenario. To remove risk and uncertainty helps a great deal in executing a credible scenario because it prevents mistakes that can expose and give clues to the scrutinizing, victimized public. Accordingly, IF remote control was utilized it would be utilized to improve the perceived event and make it more credible by limiting potentials for mistakes.
IF that is the case, why did the 'first tower hit, hit hardest, burnt worst and longest, fall last?". That is a completely backwards sequence and a huge mistake that really makes many people wonder about 9-11 and the official story. Accordingly, on message boards and forums I ask those promoting the NPT,
"Why did the perpetrators chose a backwards impact/fall sequence?"
The NPT'ers have only had one response to this and it is weak. They say, "The perpetrators heard a fireman say on the radio, "The fires are almost out, get me a small hose and I'll have them out in minutes" or something like that. Whereupon the NPT'ers state that the perpetrators decided that if the fires went out, then the towers would not have a reason to fall, exposing their ruse badly, so, they decided to use remotes to blow WTC 2 first and suffer the backwards sequence.
It is weak, and I've explained to some of the most obsessed NPT'ers that their explanation for the motive of the perpetrators is WEAK, at best. They of course, .... do not listen, so I invoke the logic that; "IF their explanation is weak within human nature, or reasoning, THEN a much better explanation could be found that made the perpetrators look good as well as provide a logical, proper impact fall sequence.
An example of how much better an explaining scenario could be found by using a proper and logical fall sequence where the North Tower falls first.
The perpetrators overhear the fireman saying the fires are going out and saying that with a hose, they will be out in minutes. The perpetrators then call their engineers who are directed to call all emergency services and order an immediate evacuation of all emergency personnel and public because the towers had suffered massive structural damage and were going to collapse. After waiting for a few hundred evacuations, drop WTC 1, then 2 immediately. The media puts out this headline, "Officials foresee structural failure of WTC 1, command evacuation, hundreds saved, weakened WTC 2 falls at the shock wave of WTC 1 hitting the ground."
Think,........ if you had the control of remotes would you not choose the second scenario instead of one where everything is backwards and you look like a liar?
Meaning, logically, there was no remote control and there were planes. However, exactly which planes we might not be sure of. Still, planes had nothing to do with the towers coming down.
NPT is a distraction pushed by the perpetrators psyops and adopted by the movement in the vacuum created by using the misinformation of the towers structure, the core. If people knew that the towers had a steel reinforced cast concrete core, they would wonder how fire did anything at all and not about if there were planes or not.
A spin off of the NPT is "all video and imagry is fake." Nearly each and every message board has an agent or 2 ready to deny that any of the imagry at the WTC is real whether planes were involved or not.
Back To The Scenario
Feedback to; firstname.lastname@example.org