|This filing, which is required by US Code has been reassigned as a civil filing. See the refusal of the court to accept disclosure of treason and improper reassignment as a civil suit.|
Christopher A. Brown, pro se
Santa Barbara, California 93160
Patricia C. Elton, pro se
1072 Casitas Pass Road #253
Carpinteria. California, 93014
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LOS ANGELES DIVISION
CHRISTOPHER A. BROWN ) U.S. CITIZENS COMPLIANCE
PATRICIA C. ELTON ) PURSUANT TO U.S.C. TITLE 18,
) PART I , CHAPTER 115,
IN RE ) §2382 DISCLOSURE AND KNOWLEDGE
) TO JUDGES OF UNITED STATES DISTRICT
FEMA ) COURT WITH ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR;
LARRY SILVERSTEIN ) WHY NYS FOIL SHOULD NOT BE UPHELD
RUDOLPH GUILIANI ) WHY PUBLIC SHOULD NOT HAVE PLANS
PUBLIC BROADCAST SYSTEM ) FOR PUBLIC BUILDINGS.
) WHY PUBLIC SHOULD NOT HAVE PUBLIC
) BROADCAST SYSTEM DOCUMENTARY.
) EXHIBITS A-E AND PANELS 1-6.
) DECLARATION OF CHRISTOPHER A.
) REQUESTS FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
To the Honorable Judge of the United States Court.
TITLE 18, PART I , CHAPTER 115, §2382
Before the court is the question involving the true structural design of the Twin Towers of New York City and a gross deception of it within acts of treason.
These Towers were begun in construction in August of 1966 and were the two tallest buildings in the world at the time. They were the first Towers of that height because of the design method using a concrete tubular core resisting flex, eliminating torsion and oscillation in high winds.
On September 11, 2001 two planes targeted the Towers for collision. The fact of assumption of collapse when the two Towers fell to the ground almost identically, at different times, not respective of impact sequence within a few hours, is intrinsically associated with the misrepresentation of the fundamental design of the Towers to official entities providing engineering analysis of collapse, invalidating that analysis.
Included accessory Exhibits and Panels of photographs are for the purpose of substantiating the commission of what these citizens know as misprision of treason.
Pursuant to TITLE 18, PART I , CHAPTER 115, §2382 U.S. Code as of: 01/19/04
Section 2382. Misprision of treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.
DISCLOSURE AND KNOWLEDGE OF TREASON TO JUDGE
This information is to make it known to judge(s) of the United States that there has been a deception on a massive scale relating to the core structure of the Twin Towers in New York City destroyed on September 11, 2001. That deception has been used to dynamically conduct misprision of treason that endanger the public.
Patricia C. Elton limits her disclosures or actual knowledge to that which is specific in her attached Affidavit. The following disclosures and information of treason are solely those of Christopher A. Brown.
The design of the structures blamed for the deaths of nearly 3,000 innocent people has been misrepresented and the cause of death on death certificates is erroneous for the reason of the deception documented here. Constitutional due process or equal protection of law has not been provided in these capital crimes. Forensic engineering analysis of collapse cannot be accurately completed without building plans or the exact design and construction of buildings such as the Twin Towers.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) volunteered to analyze collapse but did not have the actual structural plans of the Towers. Seven years of research fails to show that NIST had such plans and there are numerous signs that this was a problem years after the plans should have been available to the public.
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
10/05/01 The American Institute of Architects reports that a number of firms have been receiving requests for building plans that have raised some concern. . . . http://www.engr.psu.edu/ae/WTC/WTCTragedy.html
and EXHIBITS A through E with PANELS 1 through 6 as indicated in the following.
The deception appears to be misprision of treason. Many Americans may be endangered in their daily lives if justice is not provided and treason exposed.
I stand as a witness to the construction because of viewing an extensively detailed 2 hour PUBLIC BROADCAST SYSTEM (PBS) documentary in 1990 about the Twin tower construction. With 35 years experience as a welder who has worked in civil engineering for 25 years, I understood, very well, all that was communicated by that regarding documentary described in the attached Affidavit.
The documentary is now gone, even from the digital records of PBS which broadcast it. This factor enables the deception concealing treason disclosed herein. However a retired physicist/Ph.D. and a former Marine major searched for it and found paper records at PBS through contacts employed there which corroborates this testimony. A VHS original copy was found but DVD copy of it appears to have been intercepted. An excerpt from a 2007 web radio show that Dr. Larsen produced and I co hosted where he updated the search. It can be downloaded from, http://www.mediafire.com/?ojrkwzezomj.
REQUEST FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR ALLOWING PBS TO REMOVE DOCUMENTARY SHOWING TRUE TOWER STRUCTURE FROM ARCHIVES AND PUBLIC LIBRARIES AND DECEPTIVELY RE EDIT/DISTRIBUTE.
PBS has also re edited the original documentary footage in 2003 and titled that production, NEW YORK, The Center of the World which misrepresents the core structure of the Towers as being comprised of steel core columns.
The true core of the Towers is described in an article by Newsweek of September 13, 2001, about Leslie E. Robertson the engineer for the Twin Towers, EXHIBIT "A", with the statement, supported by a steel-tube exoskeleton and a reinforced concrete core (emphasis added).
The passage of EXHIBIT "A" is not quoted but the notion that it is an error is not credible when the term building collapse is being used to describe what killed 3,000 people and Robertson is one of the engineers of record. Liability dictates that the buildings engineer is going to be very sensitive to this matter and will be certain it is correct. EXHIBIT "A" is also completely consistent with all recall I have of the 1990 PBS documentary as well as evidence in the included exhibits.
REQUEST FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR NEW YORK STATE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION LAW TO NOT BE UPHELD
Construction photos have been filtered of images showing the true core structure which was a rectangular concrete tube. EXHIBIT "B" a print out of the NYCLU archived website shows that the ex NY mayor took the WTC documents from city offices, which contained the only plans besides those in the buildings as well as many photos and videos. A NYS state superior court judge upheld the taking, apparently without consideration of critical aspects of the NY FOIL laws. This was enablement of the deception of NIST by FEMA of the Towers structure.
REQUEST FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR ALLOWING FEMA TO MISREPRESENT THE CORE STRUCTURE OF THE TWIN TOWERS.
FEMA was not created under the Constitution and the production of the graphic representation shown in EXHIBIT "C" is a misrepresentation provided with the first WTC report.
EXHIBIT C is the only publicly released official depiction of either Towers core structure. This is a grossly inadequate drawing and is in conflict with other official and non official presented statements that are all misrepresentations or errors.
EXHIBIT "B" is deprival of construction drawings not used by NIST however the steel columns shown of EXHIBIT C the deception, are described by the NIST analysis of collapse.
EXHIBIT D Is the title page from the Structural Engineering Emergency Response Plan by August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE., November 2001., The following sheet is page 5 of the PDF Response Plan available online, http://www.ncsea.com/downloads/wtcseerp.pdf
stating the structures have a concrete core (chapter 2.1), completely consistent with. EXHIBIT "A" and images taken on 9-11, Panels 1, 2, 3 & 4, as well as the Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Technology and Innovation. Oxford University Press. p. 322. ISBN 0-19-869138-6, published in 1992 shown in a scan printed on PANEL 4, top left.
The effect of this misinformation enabling the concealment of cause of death, serving treason; is that the public seeking the truth, intuitively knowing that the collapse analysis, cannot ever be correct, are always describing the structure of buildings that did not exist at the World trade center. Or, when two buildings went down, at near free fall, almost identically, the public and their experts cannot even begin to understand what happened.
The public is deceived by Silverstein (Larry Silverstein) and associates with Silversteins leaking scans of obsolete preliminary drawings created by Leslie Robertson and misrepresenting them as final drawings to agree with EXHIBIT C. The 1990 documentary stated that Robertson, the key engineer of the Twins, made the drawing to present the basic tower concept to the Japanese architect, Yamasaki. The 1990 documentary described them as well as the erroneous NY Port Authority 18 minute film of 1983 titled, The Building of the World Trade Center. Yamasaki designed the tubular concrete core structure in WTC 1 and would ONLY certify the buildings as safe with a concrete core.
The scan of the preliminary blueprints have been digitally altered by someone to appear as final drawings by the addition of revision tables to the digital graphic files of scans. Impossible graphic anomalies that are sized and placed in the tables enabling the misrepresentation as final drawings. These plans are being presented by quasi authority to the public as if they are official, without question. See EXHIBIT E.
REQUEST FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR ALLOWING SILVERSTEIN AND ASSOCIATES TO ALTER AND MISREPRESENT OBSOLETE TWIN TOWER DRAWINGS TO THE PUBLIC.
The effect is that the public is presented privately sourced construction drawings from a party having substantial material conflict of interest which supplant the missing official plans of New York City offices as substantiated by EXHIBIT "B". The drawings leaked to the public from private sources, supposedly of the Tower structure are digitally altered scans of obsolete blueprints from Silverstein and associates deceiving the public seeking to support and defend the U. Constitution.
DECLARATION OF CHRISTOPHER A. BROWN
I the undersigned, declare under penalty of the laws of perjury of the laws of the State of California that all reproductions of this disclosure are genuine and true from the sources cited.
Christopher A. Brown
Statements of independent authorities providing testimony of a concrete core; Robertson, Oxford Encylopedia and August Domel are consistent with all images from 9-11.
Those independent sources evidencing concrete are tested against EXHIBIT C and PANEL 5 logically presented as misrepresentations of construction photos as the only corroboration's of the structure used by NIST in analysis.
WIDE SPREAD MISINFORMATION FURTHERS MISPRISION OF TREASON
Many other such quasi authorities or sources can be named who act in the same fashion unreasonably ignoring evidence then misleading the public who is seeking information to support and defend the Constitution. This deception is widely spread and believed but it will be found that no independently verifiable evidence supporting the core structure FEMA presents, (EXHIBIT C) can be produced, if the matter is officially questioned.
Included is a letter to Jimmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia whose editors refuse to utilize evidence or recognize the violation of laws that show a need to use evidence in editing of the structural page of their World trade Center series. Essentially, these editors act without considering their written policies of editing. Thereby, the editors create a misleading knowledge base and obstruct justice depriving the publics knowledge of acts furthering misprision of treason.
The parties making these disclosures of this knowledge pray for impartial consideration of this information and swift, appropriate actions upon it in the protection of our Constitution and upholding of our laws. If these citizens can be of assistance in providing higher quality digital images, please contact us.
The pages submitted with this disclosure, detail the included photographic panels and their specific meaningful information.
Christopher A. Brown
Top left, shows the western WTC 1 concrete core wall, in an end view, looking south at a fractured end facing the camera. Spire structural steel remnant on right. The north wall is missing from the NW corner eastward and the core area is empty.
Bottom right. View from NE of WTC 1 north core wall and interior box columns that surrounded the core (24 total of inner framed wall) of spire remnant at NW corner, slightly earlier than the top left image of this panel. The north wall is still standing with interior box columns silhouetted against the broken, roughly horizontal edges of the concrete wall behind them.
Top left, single frame from video link shows portion of east core wall toppling back into the empty core area. The spire, outside and on the opposite side of the core, stands in the back ground. This is about the same moment as the top left image of Panel 1.
Bottom right. Frame of video from NW showing the WTC 1 north core wall as spire is forming. Note wide, irregular base of steel element toppling out of north core wall. Steel elevator guide rail supports and sections of interior box columns with portions of concrete wall still attached tilt and fall awkwardly balanced, away from the plane of the wall.
Top left, after the spire itself has gone down, the rebar of the middle area of WTC 1 concrete north wall or rebar of the west wall near the spire location stands.
Bottom right. WTC 2 concrete core with all exterior steel gone. No steel columns protrude from the core area as they naturally would under conditions.
Top left is a scan of a photocopy of a page from "Skyscraper". Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology. Oxford University Press. p. 322. ISBN 0-19-869138-6, identifying a concrete core.
Bottom right. A portion of the WTC 2 concrete core from the top falling onto WTC 3.
Illustrates how the deception is completed by misrepresenting what were in reality elevator guide rail support steel, as steel core columns.
Top left, left and right of the center crane on the tops of the vertical steel are horizontal plates called butt plates. Crane Towers are shown atypically distributed within sockets of the crane platform in this photo with an unoccupied corner and a crane near the center. No diagonal braces or gusset plates are ever seen at intersections of horizontal and vertical elements in the core area of the guide rail support steel. Such bracing would have blocked hallways and elevators but is needed for a core of steel columns. Concrete shear walls provided the lateral support.
The concrete core walls were on the same plane as the diagonals of the crane platform, a tool for building the Towers.
Bottom. Taken from inside the core furthest guide rail support steel has a silhouetted butt plate on the furthest vertical element with red circle. Illustrates how the deception is completed by misrepresenting construction photos of elevator guide rail support steel, as showing steel core columns.
Shows a portion of the WTC 1 north side core base wall. An oversized 12 foot thick wall to distribute concrete core loads over the foundation area. This refutes the mentioned obsolete plans of Robertson misrepresented as final drawings and distributed over the internet to the public. Near the top of the APROX. 12 foot thick wall section is a APROX. 3 x 7 utility hall to connect plumbing.
This is the certified mail return to Jimmy Wales of Wikipedia
Back to 9-11 Activism
Back To The Scenario
Feedback to; firstname.lastname@example.org