Original strategy page here, National Article 5 Strategy
Download a suammry .pdf here, http://algoxy.com/ows/preparation_for_article_v.pdf
The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.
"valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution,"
This page will engage some critical thinking intended to awaken your human potential to understand the natural laws of the Constitution. Natural law comprises most of the" intents" These concepts were well known to the Indigenous Americans who were advising and guiding the framers of the Constitution regularly in creating the unity we hope to have again.
The problem with assuring that an Article V convention have full constitutional intent is one likely, intentionally created to disable citizens from defense of the Constitution or prevent the re establishment of Constitutional government under the 1787-1792 Constitution for the United States of America. Barriers have been created to the needed unity to conduct an Article V convention with full Constitutionality.
1) Media is far too controlled to allow any vital truths for effective democratic action.
2) Campaign finance reform is needed to properly, democratically elect representatives.
3) Election and voting systems need to be secured to conduct proper democracy.
Unwavering focus is needed by many Americans on the necessary strategy to gain support across the "several states" to engage an Article V convention. That focus removes any fears, or diminished appreciation of what is our first, and laws Constitutional right. If we fail to use it, we will have no more rights, or no possible way to enforce them.
Natural Law Is Known In Your Biological Responses Known as Thoughts and Feelings
It is your instincts reacting to information perceived. When you perceive the notion of your Constitutional rights, freedom of religion, speech, equal protection of law and due process and understand them, you experience feelings of appreciation, security and many of your purposes in life seem empowered. With trust and cooperation strictly focused on Constitutional natural law, you will be protected from deception and manipulation, while being able to share facts in a common realm of understanding with other Americans. This paragraph is needed because with it, you, and most other citizens are going to prevail as the ultimate authorities on our Constitution.
Knowing Interpretations of the Constitution With Greater Constitutionality
Interpretations of the Constitution that are most constitutional must tend to support the principles of the Constitution. This strategy interprets broadly in favor of the prime principles of our republic as they are found in the Declaration of Independence, Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness while engaging no dogmatic, stigmatic beliefs. Facts and science rule, but that which is commonly known rather than dependent on false authority that media refers to often.
The below links, considered with the above, make it so it can be reasoned that both congress and the supreme court, as well as past presidents, have been executing an agenda that includes many unconstitutional actions. Together, those actions represent a serious threat to the Constitution and perhaps citizens, if these conditions are allowed to continue and worsen. These links show the supreme court violating their oaths, the constitution and laws made under it. It is irrelevant that these are 1939 decisicions. Recent decisions such as "citizens united" reinforce the fact that the court cannot be relied upon to be Constititonal.
This link shows the many unconstitutional decisions made by congress relating to Article V used unreasonably to evade, delay or prevent an Article V convention, just as the above supreme court decision works to do in a different fashion.
Many more instances are on the below page, and a video featuring Bill Walker, who sued all members of congress in federal court in an effort to compell an Article V convention.
Article V Convention
Under These Conditions It Is Constitutionally Justified That All Interpretations of Article V Include the Maximum Level of Democracy
What this means is that each state needs to hold elections upon their proposed amendments as well as ratifications of amendment proposed by other states. Interpretations using the 4th, the 5th, 9th, 10th and 14th amendments of the Bill of Rights are reasonably used to justify this Constitutionally and the above reasoning, with official crimes, justifies it. We are 5 generations overdue for this convention and that delay was intentionally created to make removal of the Constitution increasingly possible by dividing the people more completely.
Article V defines that 3/4 of the states can ratify without congress, and, since Article V is one sentence, it can be said that when 3/4 of the states convene to propose, it automatically is an Article V convention. This is logically consistent with the fact that 3/4 of the states can ratify amendments at convention. A chicken and egg scenario possibly created intentionally to disable citizens from using Article V to secure Constitutional government. If congress and the supreme court are acting as they are with media, it is very likely that citizens inability to act in favor of maximum Constitutionality to conduct an Article V may cause an effective end to the Constitution of 1787.
This outreach uses the above interpretation to reduce the feelings of futility that citizens often feel when suggestions of dealing with congress and state applications are made. This argument can also reasonably be made on behalf of defense of the Constitution on the levels of state legislation's, depending on state constitutions, when petitioning them to convene delegates.
Logical Outreach Countering Futility and Apathy in Citizens.
Consider the first element of the list at the top.
1) Media is far too controlled to allow any vital truths for effective democratic action.
Citizens generally know that media provides very selective information on serious controversy that may influence democratic decisions. Logically, freedom of speech and the press are abridged. This problem must be resolved in order to conduct democracy of any kind. The only logical proposal is revise the 1st amendment of the Bill of Rights. The below is very carefully considered and will equitably secure that speech vital for survival and defense of the constitution is enabled to be shared and understood.
Draft of revised First Amendment
REV. Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; Congress shall see that nothing abridges the freedom of speech and the primary methods or systems of it shall be first accessible for the unity of the people with its possible greater meaning through understanding one another in; forgiveness, tolerance, acceptance, respect, trust, friendship and love protecting life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Congress shall see that nothing abridges freedom of the press in its service to the unity of the people; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances or defense of this constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
The above has a history that is explained in another way, here, the "Greater Meaning Of Free Speech"
Use of the simple, absolute logic of our human instincts is justified when any critic rises to the above strategy of revision of the 1st amendment, if needed to prevail in social discussion. The following question embodies the strategy:
Which mother or father in this nation will ignore or pass up the real opportunity to assure their child will grow into a nation that holds high and honors understanding that can create; forgiveness, tolerance, acceptance, respect, trust, friendship and love, protecting their life, their liberty and their pursuit of happiness?
Outreach Pivot - Showing/Demanding Full Function
Here is the point in outreach where you must stand your ground to be effective. Your opposition will almost always be relying on the social setting to continue refusing to justify accepting that the first amendment be revised. Individuals alone have nothing to gain from asserting parents would choose that their children should not grow in such a nation. In front of others, ask them, "How do you propose that media be compelled to sharing needed truths?" There is actually no fair way to assure such truths are shared by making laws, aside from making severe penalties for doing anything else. This reeks of state controlled media. The page on the "Greater Meaning Of Free Speech" explains how citizens would petition a state legislator authorized to order media corporations to publish and broadcast certain, publicly approved issues.
When Protesting At Congress Or Federal Levels, These Laws Can Be Cited as Violated By Congress
They are also applicable to justification for state legislations to begin to assemble delegates for state conventions commmprising an Article V convention.
Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order which further defines the law for purposes of enforcement. 5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office congressional members were required to take before assuming office.
5 U.S.C. 3333 required officials to sign an affidavit that they took the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not nor will violate that oath during your tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law,
5 U.S.C. 7311, which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense for anyone employed in the United States Government to advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government., Do not accept that small violations do not matter. It is the accumulations of these violations spread over much of federal government that has compromised our nation.
18 U.S.C. 1918 provides penalties for violation of oath office described in 5 U.S.C. 7311 which include: removal from office, imprisonment, and a fine.
Executive Order 10450 specifies a violation of 5 U.S.C. 7311 for any person taking the oath of office to advocate the alteration of the form of the government of the United States by unconstitutional means"
The definition of advocate is further specified in Executive Order 10450 which for purposes of enforcement supplements 5 U.S.C. 7311.
According to Executive Order 10450 (and therefore 5 U.S. 7311) any act taken by government officials who have taken the oath of office prescribed by 5 U.S.C. 3331 which alters the form of government other than by amendment, is a criminal violation of the 5 U.S.C. 7311. Such alteration without amendment is criminal violation of 5 U.S.C. 7311 and 18 U.S.C. 1918.
The original strategy page, National Article 5 Strategy has similar strategy differently described.
Some public opinions upon article 5 by informed citizens and an official.
Article V conference, Lawrence Lessig at Harvard 9/25/11-Bill Walker and other attendee video comments