This page documents the experience of posting at the Occupy Wall Street Forum (OWS) between perhaps October 29 until perhaps December 23rd 2011. The forum was an excellent opportunity with massive quantities of people who are absolutely sincere participating, then there were others that were not.
This page is about a few that were not there to defend the Constitution, but rather to undermine the defenders efforts. Below, techjunkie is working to marginalize my assertions of cognitive infiltration's by comparing what I'm saying to a pre marginalized book I'd forgotten I'd taken an excerpt from. Experiences at forums documented here are what these pages are based on and to provide independent reference, I searched and found the excerpt and copied/pasted it into the web page.In an attempt to use the apparent fact that this authors conclusions were exactly the same as mine, techjunk to reverses the cognitive logic that people are consistent with the observations, findings etc., by implying that I am some sort of representative of a cult following of the author and are some how in error by using others recognition of the information of an interview of Norman Dodd, research director of the Reece Committee..
Below I put techjunkies intentions on the table as derived from analysis of its actions.
A friend who is aware of the "Greater Meaning Of Free Speech", had done some searches using it for search terms and found that techjunkie had copied and pasted my text post at OWS at a forum called, forum.talknightlife.com, which presented a proposed revision of the First Amendment I've drafted. The revision integrates an ancient natural law doctrine originating the principles of, Life. liberty and the pursuit of happiness" found in the Declaration of Independence.
What techjunkie did was took the posts of gawdoftruth, who also happens to be in Santa Barbara and is very outspoken in a good way, so much he often overly marginalizes himself with his vitality. techjunkie left out my identity, very important for infiltrators to not spread my identity and acknowledge me in any way, and tries to use gawdoftruth's radical opposition in their argument to marginalize my position, which is basically preparatory amendment for an article V convention assuring the convention is conducted with the fullest constitutional intent.. This is vital strategy for our futures.
As I normally do when confronting people critical of the proposal to revise the first amendment, assuring speech has the needed meaning for survival, I asked techjunkie this question.
Which mother or father in this nation will ignore or pass up the real opportunity to assure their child will grow into a nation that holds high and honors understanding that can create; forgiveness, tolerance, acceptance, respect, trust, friendship and love, protecting their life, their liberty and their pursuit of happiness
No answer from techjunkie.
And there is always the "Greek Chorus" techjunkie's sock puppet characters supporting his position.
Wikipedia-misinformation on the Constitution