This page documents the
experience of posting at the Occupy Wall Street Forum (OWS)
between perhaps October 29 until perhaps December 23rd 2012.
The forum was an excellent opportunity with massive
quantities of people who are absolutely sincere
participating, then there were others that were not.
The most serious thing that
happened was a small group sabotaged my effort to get
signatures on a petition to ALEC regarding accountability to
seeing all amendments at Article V have constitutional
thread can still be viewed, 3/21/16, here.
ACTION-Petition ALEC to make a statement about the concept of Preparatory Amendment before an Article V convention
American Legislative Exchange Council 1101 Vermont Ave. N.W., 11th Floor Washington, D.C. 20005 Phone: 202-466-3800 | Fax: 202-466-3801
What is the title of your petition?
Does ALEC Really Want An Article V Convention with Constitutional Intent?
2. Who is the target of your petition?
American Legislative Exchange Council-ALEC, First Vice Chairman
Rep. John Piscopo
3. What issue best describes your petition?
Request for definition of ALEC's position on preparation for Article V assuring constitutional intent.
4. Why should people sign this?
Article V is the right to "alter or abolish" from the Declaration of Independence codified in the Constitution. The creator of this petition has seen activity on web forums which is dominantly consistent with the presence of "cognitive infiltration as recommended by Cass Sunstein) in 2008 to Obama. The witnessed activities intent can only be interpreted as choreographed to alienate or make Americans fearful of the 5th Clause of the US Constitution, Article V.
This is a completely independent petition which concerns legal process and the meaning of speech, expression, opinion and democracy under the principles of this republic. It is for the purpose of ending American citizens fears of an Article V convention, a runaway or hijacked situation, the signatories to this petition, self declared constitutional citizens in defense of the constitution, HEREBY request that ALEC provide an opinion upon the concept and notion of preparing for an Article V with the goal of assuring all amendments have constitutional intent.
Amendment effecting these issues is considered preparation.
1)End the abridging of free speech
2)Campaign finance reform
3)Secure the vote
After amendment effecting the needed change has had its impact on American democracy, Article V can safely, constitutionally proceed.
Does ALEC support that American people should take the role of "rightful masters of the congress and courts" (Lincoln 1859). Sign this petition to hopefully see the proper accountability, or some; to defense of the constitution; delivered, if possible, by ALEC through a statement to the creator of the petition, or thepetitionsite.com, or a page at their website dedicated to the peoples perceptions of what constitutional intent is.
Other encounters with covert agents:
This page is about a few that were not there to defend the Constitution, but rather to undermine the defenders efforts. Below, techjunkie is working to marginalize my assertions of cognitive infiltration's by comparing what I'm saying to a pre marginalized book I'd forgotten I'd taken an excerpt from. Experiences at forums documented here are what these pages are based on and to provide independent reference, I searched and found the excerpt and copied/pasted it into the web page.In an attempt to use the apparent fact that this authors conclusions were exactly the same as mine, techjunk to reverses the cognitive logic that people are consistent with the observations, findings etc., by implying that I am some sort of representative of a cult following of the author and are some how in error by using others recognition of the information of an interview of Norman Dodd, research director of the Reece Committee..
Below I put techjunkies intentions on the table as derived from analysis of its actions.
A friend who is aware of the "Greater Meaning Of Free Speech", had done some searches using it for search terms and found that techjunkie had copied and pasted my text post at OWS at a forum called, forum.talknightlife.com, which presented a proposed revision of the First Amendment I've drafted. The revision integrates an ancient natural law doctrine originating the principles of, Life. liberty and the pursuit of happiness" found in the Declaration of Independence.
What techjunkie did was took the posts of gawdoftruth, who also happens to be in Santa Barbara and is very outspoken in a good way, so much he often overly marginalizes himself with his vitality. techjunkie left out my identity, very important for infiltrators to not spread my identity and acknowledge me in any way, and tries to use gawdoftruth's radical opposition in their argument to marginalize my position, which is basically preparatory amendment for an article V convention assuring the convention is conducted with the fullest constitutional intent.. This is vital strategy for our futures.
As I normally do when confronting people critical of the proposal to revise the first amendment, assuring speech has the needed meaning for survival, I asked techjunkie this question.
Which mother or father in this nation will ignore or pass up the real opportunity to assure their child will grow into a nation that holds high and honors understanding that can create; forgiveness, tolerance, acceptance, respect, trust, friendship and love, protecting their life, their liberty and their pursuit of happiness
No answer from techjunkie.
And there is always the "Greek Chorus" techjunkie's sock puppet characters supporting his position.
Wikipedia-misinformation on the Constitution