EXHIBIT 7
Motion to Disqualify
Americans need to understand how our government has failed us, what needs to be corrected. Our judicial system is to blame when a judge cannot see his own prejudice. Government by not strictly following defined duties, then the people for allowing records to disappear.
After the motion in case #209449, May 15, 1997 was denied, the source of the transcripts for this motion to disqualify, I left the courthouse and drove 2 miles. I was followed by special investigators from the DA's office who asked me for my drivers license when I emerged from my car. It was expired, they knew it, and the DMV wouldn't renew it until I paid child support. Here is the CITATION and the "VERBAL NOTICE"
Here is the text of the motion.
Please Take notice that on this day..........June 8,.........1998, at this time..8:00 AM.., in the Santa Barbara County Superior Court Department...#6........, located at 1100 Anacapa Street, Santa Barbara, California, the Plaintiff in the above action asks for the following relief. Plaintiff will ask that Judge be disqualified from hearing this case. This motion will be based on the memorandum of Points and Authorities, Exhibits attached and Declaration and any oral argument made at the hearing.
Date; May 7, 1998
Christopher A. Brown, in PRO PER
POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
This notice and motion is based on the following points and authorities of the Code of Civil Procedure Section 170.6. and Plaintiff therefore asks to disqualify the Judge.
Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6 disqualification of Judges is "automatic", when good faith belief in prejudice is sufficient without proof of facts. McCartney v. Commission on Judicial Qualifications (1974) 12 Cal. 3d 512, 531-532, 116 Cal Rptr. 260, 526 P.2d 268.
Prejudice as established by motion that Judge is so prejudiced that party cannot have fair and impartial trail. Mayr v. Superior Court (1964) 228 Cal. App. 2d 60, 61 39 Ca. Rptr. 240.
Another matter before the Judge, Family law and Motion, The County of Santa Barbara vs. Christopher Brown, case #209449, held on Friday, May 16, 1997, transcript attached as EXHIBIT ONE, establishes the prejudice of the Judge against conspiracies.
DECLARATION OF CHRISTOPHER A. BROWN
I Christopher A. Brown Declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. I am the Plaintiff in the above action and that the Judge, before whom this case is pending is prejudiced against the party or the interest of the party, so that the Plaintiff believes that he cannot have a fair and impartial trial before the Judge.
CONCLUSION
This action, case # 220298, alleges a conspiracy, the same as case #209449 (transcripts), the Judge is prejudice against conspiracies. A fair and impartial trial before a Judge is the plaintiffs only protection from the conspiracy.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that the relief herein be granted.
Christopher A. Brown,
in PRO PER
Judicial Review Transcripts demonstrating prejudice
Motion for Emergency Injunctive Relief
4/8/99 Motion to amend minute order of 6/8/98
Written Statement to the Comission on Judicial Performance