Appellate Decision

Appellate court judges have the same duty to the constitution as all other state court judges. At all times the federal law was invoked, and always ignored. Simply filing disclosures, a citizen never sees a judge. When using estoppel to justify an exemption to petty fines in order to support the constitution with free speech disclosing treason. Note the decision does not mention estoppel. Estoppel is the one thing that is an absolute because no law excusing appelate court judges from taking disclosure was cited.

I decided to specifically ask for the written decision regarding the issue of concealment of treason and the federal law, because that is what this is really about. Showing these judges are actually enabling treason by concealing it or ignoring laws against concealing it. In retrospect I wish I had also asked for a written decision on estoppel.

The below text is from the appeal. As can be seen on the last scan of the decision, the appelate judges found no law exempting them from accepting evidence disclosing treason.

REQUEST FOR WRITTEN DECISION REGARDING U.S.C TITLE 18, PART I, CHAPTER 115, 2382 AND THIS APPEAL

Appellant requests written legal authority exempting appeals court judges from lawful consideration with responsiveness and or judicial duty relating to united states code, title 18, part I, chapter 115, 2382

This documentation of official judicial behaviors is vital for all Americans to witness. This is but one compelling reason America need a Lawful and Peaceful Revolution

EXHIBIT ONE:

(NOTE: the original face page had "38 pages" written in below the clerks file stamp)

EXHIBIT TWO:

Back to Seat Belt Appeal Brief

Back to Treason Resist