Frauds Of The Court Enabling Secrecy For Treason

Psychology officially has the task of defining that methods of secret treason and murder in America are being done with abuses of the unconscious mind. But, when academia of medicine is controlled by domestic enemies, this is not possible.
This page is disclosing my of knowledge of methods of concealing treason pursuant to Title 18, part I, chapter 115, §2382, but judges will not observe US code.  Therefor, these efforts are directed at Citizens who are the rightful masters of the congress and the court.

Compiled, written 1/14/18, Christopher A. Brown

These are events in courts in Southern California, most in state superior court, two in federal court.  The secret factions controlling courts are using fraud in the court to prevent me from having the economic power to use my right to free speech effectively to disclose treason.  They know, that I know the truth of what they can do, and are doing.  Because they themselves were infiltrated unconsciously perhaps 900 years ago, they, often, do not consciously know what they are doing.

The civil case filed in Los Angeles in 2006 was about getting the very best mental health care for California Citizens.  More specifically, treatment for alcoholism and drug addiction.  Care pursuant to the Hippocratic oath. 

California Health and Safety Code 1370.4 basically requires that a municipality work with the public to develop treatment if the there is a chance of death in 2 years without it.   I was attempting to address a conspiracy between the mental health dept., the sheriffs dept, the public defenders, office and a judge in family law court that is central to some of the instances listed below and filed in federal court. 

That US district court of the 9th circuit had unlawfully removed a court rule from 1885 of the civil rights reconstruction era which gave a new magistrate and judge to a civil rights case that had been filed, dismissed, then refiled with new co plaintiffs.  This was done knowing it was against the law because the local court rule removed had been prior placed in a separately bound section of the rules, which created a duplication of the "related cases" aspect of judicial assignment.  The separate section made it very easy to alter the rules by simply removing the index sheet from the main body of rules which referred to the separated section titled "Assignment of Magistrates and Judges" and that section.   

But another event shows the collusion between the private sector of media when a copy of the suit was given to a reporter at the local paper in hopes the paper would do a story about the case because it had a huge public interest aspect.   Keep in mind, that ONLY the supreme court can make rules and the "Administrative Offices Of The US district courts has strict regulation regarding changing rules that have an impact on civil rights.  A public notice must be published in news papers and public comment taken, then used in the rule change. 

http://algoxy.com/law/no_free_press/sbsecretsofmedia.html

These three pages linked below are about my effort to disclose my knowledge of the concealment of treason related to 9/11, pursuant to US code to a federal judge.  Again, another rule change was made that was unlawful because it is inconsistent with US code.

TITLE 18, PART I , CHAPTER 115, §2382 U.S. Code as of: 01/19/04
Section 2382. Misprision of treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.

Do you read anywhere in the above that something must be filed with the clerk?  No. The Ninth Circuit District court unlawfully changed their rules requiring that judges ONLY can read something that has been filed with the clerk.  This provides opportunity to conceal treason, and that is exactly what the judges did as is proven here with court documents.


http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11title_18.disclosure.html

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11title_18.civreassign.html

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11title_18.civreasign1.html



The below are cases where the court was fraudulent to prevent me from recovering from frauds perpetrated against me or to burden me unjustly, or to damage me by rendering me homeless.  All in violation of state law and the constitution for the express purpose of aiding and abetting treason.  The agenda however is unconscious.
It really should be noted that this unconscious-ness, is something that is inherent to secret societies and women are extensively used. The disclosure of treason to the US district court above was filed in a court that had a woman as the presiding judge. Many of the following actions have judges that are women. This page is a compilation of facts about hypnosis and its effects on women, as well as notable legal, high profile cases that should be familiar to many people. http://algoxy.com/law/treasonresist/womenandhypnosis.html


FRAUDS OF THE COURT INTENDED TO CONCEAL TREASON BY IMPAIRING A CITIZEN FROM DISCLOSING IT EFFECTIVELY.


1) MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE THAT STATED PREJUDICE AGAINST CONSPIRACY
5/6/1999-Motion to disqualify case 220298
http://algoxy.com/missingknowledge/220motdisqual.html

Transcripts from family law hearing showing prejudice.
5/16/97-Transcripts demonstrating prejudice justifying disqualification in case, 220298
http://algoxy.com/missingknowledge/distrans1.html



2) COMPLAINT FOR NEGLECT AND HYPNOTIC MANIPULATION
Reporters Transcript of Trial.  Judge accepts the failure to appear on subpoena. Takes testimony from un-sworn county employees in audience without having the court reporter leave note of the fact in the transcripts.  Pages 25 - 26 show fraud by the court reporter altering my practiced statement. Transcripts omit the judges statement "I don't think so" regarding the calling of the non objecting defendant to testify.  The defendant would have admitted to using hypnosis on me for 20+ years behind memory barriers which would have verified my past and given value my literature and music which was post hypnotically created.
9/8/98-http://algoxy.com/missingknowledge/220transp2526.html

6/8/98-Motion to amend minute order which deprived me of appeal, amended "nunc pro tunc" depriving me of appeal a second time.
http://algoxy.com/law/nojustice2/220motamend4min17ord.html



3) UNLAWFUL DETAINER
4/8/1999-Exparte filed on time, but judge refused to recognize it regarding unlawful detainer.
http://algoxy.com/law/nojustice2/229276exparjudnote.html



4)SMALL CLAIMS ACTION SC-999556
Case naming a Superior Court judge for fraud who allowed contempt of Court in case 220298 on 9/8/98. The defendant judge failed to appear, which is an automatic default judgement in favor of the plaintiff. A retired woman judge from Nevada was brought in to conduct this fraud of the court. See the declaration
of a witness on this page who was also a retired Wisconsin BAR attorney as well as a federal BAR attorney.
http://algoxy.com/law/nojustice2/timeline3.html



5) COMPLAINT FOR NEGLIGENCE, PSYCHIATRIC MALPRACTICE, INFLICTION OF MENTAL AND EMOTIONAL DISTRESS October 13, 1998 Hearing of demurrer calendered for December 18, 1999. Continued without proper notice. One hour after the continued hearing I was targeted for a collision. This has happened 4 times within this ordeal. There are links on this page to documentations of those collisions.
http://algoxy.com/law/nojustice3/famlaw/226736notdemurrer12.18ex25.html



6) COMPLAINT FOR NEGLECT TO SAFETY OF RESIDENTS BY COUNTIES FAILURE TO APPEAR
8/11/2000-Complaint with face page and request for judicial notice in caption.
http://algoxy.com/law/nojustice2/01032ndamendcomp.html
8/21/2000-Motion to disqualify judge
http://algoxy.com/law/nojustice2/0103motdisqmclaff.html
8/21/2000-Transcripts, regarding request for judicial notice (RJN) of mass murder (school shootings) with request for judicial notice in caption denied
http://algoxy.com/law/nojustice2/0103trmotdis4n5.html



7) TRANSCRIPTS OF HEARING RE-WRITTEN BY COMMISSIONER OF STATE COURT
Hearing transcripts for case 209449, March 30, 2004. I had essentially tricked the commissioner into admitting that she had violated my rights in a small claims fraud case by refusing to examine evidence presented against Joseph Nicholas Brower, a check with "stop payment" written on it, prima facie fraud, for $2500. She then decided for his countersuit against me for $4500.
http://algoxy.com/law/nojustice3/famlaw/209449trans.debtexam3_30_4.htm



8) JUDGE ACCEPTS PLEADING FROM PARTY PROVEN AS PERJURUS
10/2/2002- Judge accepts written perjury on state court documents from defendant, then against plaintiff in small claims despite verbal objections to proven perjurous character of defendant.
http://algoxy.com/law/nojustice3/famlaw/brooks.ex41.fam.html



9) CIVIL COMPLAINT FOR FRAUD, $30k
12/23/2003 - Judge pre decides case despite factors showing artifice in fraud.  CCCP§1972 "when a contract is partially performed, specific performance to complete the contract can be performed"
Case No. 01129618
http://algoxy.com/law/nojustice3/famlaw/1129618.buster.ex36.fam.html



10) MOTION TO DISQUALIFY COMMISSIONER
1/7/2008-Motion to disqualify commissioner
http://algoxy.com/law/nojustice3/famlaw/209449mo.disq.12_11_07.html
1/14/2008-Motion for evidentiary hearing stamped "RECEIVED" rather than "filed" by family law clerk. A violation of due process
http://algoxy.com/law/nojustice3/famlaw/209449mo.evid.sterne2_14_8.html
1/14/2008-Motion to strike commissioners declaration from the record. stamped "RECEIVED" rather than "filed" by family law clerk. A violation of due process
http://algoxy.com/law/nojustice3/famlaw/209449mo.strik.sterdec2_14.html
1/17/2008-Commissioners Declaration
http://algoxy.com/law/nojustice3/famlaw/209449.dec.sterne.disq.ans.html



11)  MARSDEN HEARING
4/21/2006-Opening brief for marsden hearing.
http://algoxy.com/law/nojustice3/famlaw/-209449openbriefmars5.3.6.html
5/3/2006-Transcripts
http://algoxy.com/law/nojustice3/famlaw/-209449trans1marsden5.3.6.html
5/3/2006-Order omitting fact of filed, written pleadings and oral argument at hearing
http://algoxy.com/law/nojustice3/famlaw/209449order.marsden5.3.6.html
6/22/2006-Motion to amend.
http://algoxy.com/law/nojustice3/famlaw/209449.motamend5.3ord.htm



12) MOTION FOR ESTOPPEL 2006
6/22/2006-Motion to quash based on estoppel
http://algoxy.com/law/nojustice3/famlaw/209449supmotquas.estopp.html
6/22/2006-Requests for judicial notice (RJN).
http://algoxy.com/law/nojustice3/famlaw/209449reqjudnot.quash.6.22.html
6/22/2006-Brower, check w/stop payment of the RJN.
http://algoxy.com/law/nojustice3/famlaw/1130424.brower.ex35.fam.html
3/30/2004-Letter of witness in audience recalling the commissioner had stated she had not seen the check w/stop payment  at hearing March 30, 2004.  The witness was present on my request to hear the commissioners response to question about the evidence of the check with "stop payment" in the RJN (Request for judicial notice) which was refused as evidence in small claims court earlier with the same commissioner.  At the family law hearing the commissioner stated she had not seen the check w/stop payment before.  By the time I had gotten around to ordering transcripts, the commissioner had accessed the court reporters computer and re-written the account of the hearing.  Prima facie fraud.
http://algoxy.com/law/nojustice3/cv06_comp/cv06_2085.exhib2.html
3/30/2004-Transcripts of hearing March 30, 2004.  The commissioner accessed the court reporters computer and re wrote the transcripts leaving out her admission to an act that violated my right to present evidence.  That act cost me $2500 eventually.
http://algoxy.com/law/nojustice3/famlaw/209449trans.debtexam3_30_4.htm



13)UNLAWFUL DETAINER 1/20/12 Case 1384705
This case demonstrates very well the completely unreasonable, fraudulent position judges have consistently taken, making a fraud of the court. Refusal to consider evidence or recognize, follow and uphold laws is a glaring fraud. Very basically the judge showed a preference for a meth cooking operation over a Citizen seeking judicial intervention to create habital housing. The testimony of 2 witnesses and 2 declarations, one witnessing a fire (mobile meth lab), in the bed of the cookers truck at the curb by the house. Also those of other tenants to extreme chemical vapors and the fact the meth cooker had been convicted of meth manufacture at the same location 19 years before, and over 80 visits from the sheriffs dept. in the prior 3 years; were all ignored by the judge. Add this to the fact that the landlord wrote as reason for the unlawful detainer, facts that show the eviction was retaliatory, which is not allowed by state law. The outcome nearly made me homeless, but where I ended up has no internet and no electrical power, which seriously impedes my ability to disclose treason further.
http://algoxy.com/law/ud.glenbrook/sbmethcook+court.html


14) REQUEST TO WAIVE FINE BASED ON PROVEN CONCEALMENT OF TREASON BY FEDERAL JUDGES IN CALIFORNIA
7/23/2015- Decision on Appeal for seat belt ticket-PENAL CODE SECTION 38- Misprision of treason- CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE 3 SEC. 1-GOVERNMENT CODE 18200 by aiding and abetting the concealment of treason. Judges must support and defend the federal constitution and laws pursuant to the california constitution.
Case No. 41932TL
http://algoxy.com/law/treasonresist/disc.seatbelt.trial.html BAIL never returned because commissioner intercepted it and applied it to child support
http://algoxy.com/law/treasonresist/disc.court.behavior4.html



15)MOTION FOR ESTOPPEL 2017
Commissioner refuses to observe legal relationship between agents of the principal county, the sheriffs dept. and child support services.
http://algoxy.com/law/treasonassist/mot.estoppel.secrecy.html

Disclosure of knowledge of Treason to

California Superior Court Judges

Back To Law

Back To Algoxy