Motion to Disqualify all Santa Barbara Superior
Court Judges
After appearing before numerous judges and filed small
claims action against one for defrauding me of a fair trial whereupon all
judges recused themselves, it is reasonable to assume that all the judges
from that point in time are prejudice.
POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
This notice and motion is based on the following points and authorities of the Code of Civil Procedure Section 170.6. and Plaintiff therefore asks to disqualify all Santa Barbara superiorcourt judges.
Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6 disqualification of Judges is "automatic", when good faith belief in prejudice is sufficient without proof of facts. McCartney v. Commission on Judicial Qualifications (1974) 12 Cal. 3d 512, 531-532, 116 Cal Rptr. 260, 526 P.2d 268.
Prejudice as established by motion that Judge is so prejudiced that party cannot have fair and impartial trail. Mayr v. Superior Court (1964) 228 Cal. App. 2d 60, 61 39 Ca. Rptr. 240.
Another matter, as shown on ORDER OF ASSIGNMENT dated 11/03/99, attached as EXHIBIT ONE, CHRISTOPHER A. BROWN vs WILLIAM GORDON, small claims action 999556, states that "ALL SANTA BARBARA SUPERIOR COURT JUDGES HAVE BEEN DISQUALIFIED" for adjudication of the entitled matter, establishing the prejudice of the Santa Barbara County Superior Court Judges against Christopher A. Brown. Attached EXHIBIT TWO, the Declaration of Hilleary Williams establishes, that retired judge Dana Henry Senit is also prejudiced when failing to examine plaintiffs evidence or recognize fundaments of "official discretion".
CONCLUSION
EXHIBIT ONE concerning case #999556 alleging fraud, by William Gordon, a Santa Barbara Superior Court judge, in a failure to provide a fair and impartial trial, a duty owed to any plaintiff who pays fees to file a legal action in a court of law, is emotionally inflammetory in nature to judical officers and after all Santa Barbara Superior Court judges have been disqualified from hearing the matter, a general prejudice against the plaintiff is created. This action, case #01035100, alleges an evasion of duty by Santa Barbara County. Part of the alleged evasion is an unaccountability for missing court case files. The Judges of the Santa Barbara County Superior Court have a CONFLICT OF INTEREST due to allegations of deficient record keeping and the interests of their employer, Santa Barbara County. A fair and impartial trial before a Judge is the plaintiffs only means of protecting his children, himself and children in Santa Barbara County schools.
DECLARATION OF CHRISTOPHER A. BROWN
I Christopher A. Brown Declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. I am the Plaintiff in the above action and that all Santa Barbara Court Judges are prejudiced against my legal actions, and that the judges of the named Court, before whom this case is pending are prejudiced against the party or the interest of the party, so that the Plaintiff believes that he cannot have a fair and impartial trial before the Judges of the Santa Barbara Superior Court.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that the relief herein be granted.
Date;
Christopher A. Brown,
in PRO PER