Motion for Order to Show Cause for not barring Santa Barbara County From using County Funds to Evade Duty.
Year after year I file lawsuits based in obvious violations of Government Code and the Constitution while the County Counsel gets paid public money to file demurrers that are unfairly granted by courts that are colluding with the County. It does not seem possible to get rid of the court however the violations of Oaths of office swearing "true faith and allegiance" to the Constitution of the United States are something difficult to overlook in any confusion created by corrupted lawyers.
This was filed ex-parte on June 10, 2000.
Denied.
To Defendants attorneys of record, County of Santa Barbara:
Plaintiff hereby does move for a MOTION TO SHOW CAUSE for not barring and preventing the use of County funds for the defense of the defendants who are employees of the County of Santa Barbara in the civil action of Christopher A. Brown. The motion is based on the NOTICE OF MOTION, the REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE of the exhibits introduced as EVIDENCE justifying production of an ORDER and the declaration of Christopher A. Brown, and on such evidence as may be presented at the hearing of the motion.
Date;
Christopher A. Brown,
pro per plaintiff,
PLAINTIFFS REQUESTS FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
OF EVASION OF DUTY AND CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Christopher A. Brown, the plaintiff in this legal action requests judicial notice of EXHIBIT THREE (complaint), consisting of two letters denying the plaintiff of witness and evidence in civil action 220298, specifically requesting that the court take judicial notice of the fact that the letter of August 31, 1998 from the supervisor of records at the county jail states that "I have been in contact with the County Counsel and have been advised to return your check number 338 for the amount of $15.00 and to advise you that I do not have the records for the period you have requested." Plaintiff requests that the court recognize that the County Counsel has advised the records supervisor to evade the supervisors duty to the plaintiff in case 220298 as well as violate his civil rights to equal protection of the law and facilitating the evasion of duties of Santa Barbara County as defined by California Gov. codes, H&W and others relating to record keeping. The advised action to the supervisor of records substantiates that a CONFLICT OF INTEREST exists between the uses of county funds to defend the County employees named in this action and the Counties duties to the public.
JUSTIFICATION OF ORDER BARRING USE OF PUBLIC FUNDS
TO DEFEND OR TO ALLOW TO CONTINUE THE COUNTIES EVASION OF DUTY.
Plaintiffs submission of this motion is supported by EXHIBIT THREE (complaint) as well as the complaint (EX. TWO P. 5, 2nd para. EX. FIVE, P.5, 2nd para.) as well as demurrers from civil action 220298 and 226736. In both cases the County used public funds to evade its duty. By the evasion, the public record has been deprived of the demonstrations of the inability of the County to defend itself from the plaintiffs numerous allegations of neglect to duties defined by California State Government Code (see P.s 3 paragraphs 6&7.of complaint). A continued neglect of duty by the County constitutes a severe threat to the lives of children in County schools or CHILD ENDANGERMENT.
REQUEST FOR ORDER
Plaintiff respectfully requests that the order of the court resulting from this motion address the County Counsel of the County of Santa Barbara and forbid or bar any defendant named who is a County employee, to use public funds for legal defense in this legal action under the penalties of contempt of Court as defined by California State laws.
DECLARATION OF CHRISTOPHER A. BROWN
I Christopher a. Brown Declare on June 25, 2000 under the penalty of the laws of perjury of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
Date;
Christopher A. Brown