EXHIBIT SIX
In 1996 I knew this was going to happen. The district attorney handling the prosecution would not present it to the court.
At trial in case No. 220298
Judge Willliam Gordon allowed contempt of Court by the County of Santa Barbara
when two subpoena duces tecum upon the custodian of public records and their
records was denied. Depriving the plaintiff of a fair and impartial trial
as well as protection for his family.
EXHIBIT TWO and THREE are copies of letters from the Santa Barbara County Sheriffs Department denying the presence of subpoenaed witnesses and their records at plaintiffs trial of September 8 1998.
EXHIBIT TWO, a letter of August 31, 1998, from Darleen Thompson, records supervisor II of the custody division and the non appearance of the subpoenaed witness and records at trial on September 8, 1998.
EXHIBIT THREE The letter of November 18, 1998 Paulina Mach-Lau of the Business and finance department concerning the non appearance of Sheriffs Officer Tony Baker at trial on September 8, 1998.
The nature of the offense initiating M992970 is similar to another incident in 1996. The declarant explained to all concerned in 1996, that W. O. needed therapy that was not yet available to prevent acting on compulsions he was hypnotically programmed to act on within the conspiracy against Christopher A. Brown. The declarant as plaintiff in case 220298 sought information adequate in establishing the validity of the application of hypnosis as a medical treatment for extreme behaviors with the subpoena duces tecum represented by EXHIBIT TWO and EXHIBIT THREE.
The declarant has sufficient experience with the understandings of the subconscious mind possessed by Native American Medicine people used to influence W. O. to, and in conjunction with the skill and experience of a clinical hypnotist, treat the sexual or aggressive compulsions of W. O. and states that punishment will not end W. O. compulsions and it offers no guarantee to the victim or the public by legal threat to W. O. that he will not return at a later time to act again, inappropriately towards H T Brown or her mother K T or another female member of the public.
I Christopher A. Brown declare under penalty of the laws of perjury of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that the copies of EXHIBITS submitted to the court are true copies.
Executed September 16, 1999.
Date;
Christopher A. Brown,