There are three keys of action to our lawful and
peaceful revolution. The first is our agreement upon prime
constitutional intent, the second key is that we have a method to
make and record such agreement upon that intent. The third key
of action is the lawful process of the agreement itself.
There are two elements of agreement for prime constitutional
intent "We the People" must make that are the foundation of our
lawful and peaceful revolution. ONE is that we have the
right to alter or abolish, the SECOND is that free speech has the
ultimate purpose of enabling the unity required to effectively
alter or abolish. And, inherent to those two is that these
are the most prime constitutional intents of our framing
documents. They protect all other rights.
This proposal is founded in historical precedent and that is the
last key of action, the legal process that we use to
actually alter or abolish. The process begins informally
between "the people" with inquiry amongst them focusing on prime
FIRST INQUIRY OF AGREEMENT
As a Citizen of a state of the united states for America, do
you understand, agree and accept then DECLARE it is
constitutional intent that the framers of the founding
documents intended for us to alter or abolish government
destructive to our unalienable rights?
SECOND INQUIRY OF
As a Citizen of a state of the united
states for America, do you understand, agree, accept then
DECLARE it is constitutional intent that the ultimate
purpose of free speech be to enable the unity adequate to
effectively alter or abolish government destructive to our
No unity has been possible with the corporate control over
media. Therein is the biggest problem, but this is about
Within the second key of action is agreement upon law that
we MUST use the 9th amendment and that we do have rights that are
not written in the constitution.
Ninth Amendment - U.S.
The enumeration in the
Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be
construed to deny or disparage others retained by the
What is said here is that there are nearly an infinite number of
rights we can think of that ARE RETAINED by us, the people, if we
can agree upon them. That is the catch, "the people" refers
to basically a unified mass of some proportion approaching a
We have a catch 22 here. We cannot share these facts
of the law of the land until we have control over the law of the
land which can be made to require and then enable the sharing of
these facts that perpetuate the constitution.
However, it is possible. We must keep a
saying in mind.
"If we always do what we've always done we'll always get what
we've always got."
Yea, I know there are cognitive distortions of "all or nothing
thinking" there, but in some cases such distortions are
true. And, there is good reason to believe this is one of
them. Meaning we have to go out of our way to share these
agreements and spoken understanding of this process which is NOT
complicated. and also not very far out of our way. Any
discussion of politics and the state of our nation can carry this
information with perfect context.
One thing is sure, "politics as usual"
promise to keep things as they've always been.
The right we retained that is needed now is the right to prepare
for Article V. Many people are afraid of Article V because
the state and federal governments are in control so could runaway
with it, IF we are not prepared to control it, or them. An
important right contained in Article V is the right that all
amendments have constitutional intent. AND, there is the
distinct possibility that major corporations are colluding to HIJACK
Article V, ignoring its intent! Accordingly, this page and
its strategy may become vital constitutional defense.
|The Congress, whenever two
thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall
propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the
Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the
several States, shall call a Convention for proposing
Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid
to all Intents and Purposes, as part of this
Constitution, when ratified by the
Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or
by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the
one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by
the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be
made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and
eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth
Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and
that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of
its equal Suffrage in the Senate.
Most critical here, is that "The People" are the only entity that
can define constitutional intent, congress, the court and state
legislators can only interpret it. This is related
to the 9th amendment. In all, the undefined right of the
ultimate purpose of free speech and that of the right to prepare
to assure all amendments have constitutional intent, is the heart
of this strategy to perpetuate the constitution. And, such a
notion is supremely constitutional in itself.
We agree upon the ultimate purpose of free speech, and to use
the 9th amendment to formally define that right through Article V,
and that we have the right to use Article V itself to prepare and
assure all amendments have constitutional intent.
The process. The People
With Law, Purify Politics.
Firstly, the agreement upon the purpose of free
speech must be widely spread. To do that, the people
reading must realize that this can be done within their
normal, daily lives and be a part of the political activities
if they have them, but, in itself, is NOT politics.
Things are getting desperate here in America and there is good
reason to unify upon something different. Even those
that are apolitical can see this and this activity is not
actually political, it is the root of lawfullness. This
costs us nothing and is a good exercise creating respect for
the function of free speech.
How we do this.
After a degree of agreement is reached, I recommend ONE online
petition be started where people sign and provide the state
they are from, then we can embark on this phase of activism
which essentially purifies our state legislatures, who also,
cannot by law define constitutional intent, so MUST by law
take our direction and definition of constitutional intent IF
we are to manifest that all amendments "shall be valid
to all Intents and Purposes, as part of this Constitution"
as Article V defines.
A) Test legislators (all officials and candidates) for
acceptance of the root purpose of free speech as being to
assure information vital to unity needed to alter or abolish
is shared and understood.
B) Test legislators (all
officials and candidates) for acceptance of
the root purpose of free speech as prime constitutional intent
used to create unity to conduct Article V with constitutional
intent for the purpose of protecting unalienable rights.
C) As an official of government, can you accept that EVERY
American can understand and accept A as the people have agreed
and accepted, has the right under the 9th amendment to define
D) Are you aware that in 1911, 2/3 of the states applied for a
convention and congress violated the law, their oath and the
constitution by failing to convene delegates and that this
This document has links to the letter sent to the clerk of
congress and other aspects related.
Such a fact justifies that all delegates be elected in the
states by the people of those states?
Because of that letter, the house finally adopts rule to count
states applications for Article V.
However, congress refused to start counting applications
occuring before the letter. The speakers were sued.
That suit, of course was denied. Government is deeply
unlawful. These .pdf's by Bill Walker explain the
National Archives and Records Administration Attempts
Termination of Article V Convention
E) Can you understand and accept that any state legislator
that cannot accept A), can be impeached in this constitutional
emergency as being unfit for office because they are prepared
to deprive citizens of their right to see all amendments at
Article V have constitutional intent?
F) Can you understand and accept that under the 9th amendment
A) B) C) D) E) all of which amount to legal process to defeat
a recalcitrant congress in constitutional usurpation, and that
IF citizens act with D) as justification for E) with 3/4 of
the states to complete the legal process, they WILL be "the
rightful masters of the congress and the courts" BECAUSE their
states, as led by the people, then will agree as the people of
the states have, that proper preparation for Article V is also
a right under the 9th amendment if the people define it and it
1) Amending Article V to assure the right to "alter or
abolish" is enforceable under law by including preparatory
amendment as a requirement.
2) End the
abridging of the PURPOSE of free speech.
3) Securing the vote.
4) Campaign finance reform.
G) Americans need to agree that Officials of states and
federal government must accept that such preparation by
amendment is completely constitutional and can only enable
democratic assertion of the principles of the republic, and,
once complete; WHEREUPON all amendment should cease until
America can be certain, by testing itself using the purpose of
free speech, that it is competent to Article V and can define
That is literally the entire process. It is LAW, not
politics. It does purify politics however.
Partisanship will return to parties working to express the
will of our constitution republic either by strict
interpretation of principle or by democratic determinations.
When Protesting At Congressional Or
Federal Levels, These Laws Can Be Cited as Violated By
They are also applicable to justification for
state legislations to begin to assemble delegates for state
conventions comprising an Article V convention.
Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials
is divided into four parts along with an executive order which
further defines the law for purposes of enforcement. 5 U.S.C.
3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office
congressional members were required to take before assuming
5 U.S.C. 3333 required officials to sign an affidavit that
they took the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and
have not nor will violate that oath during your tenure of
office as defined by the third part of the law,
5 U.S.C. 7311, which explicitly makes it a federal criminal
offense for anyone employed in the United States Government to
“advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of
government.”, Do not accept that small violations do not
matter. It is the accumulations of these violations spread
over much of federal government that has compromised our
18 U.S.C. 1918 provides penalties for violation of oath office
described in 5 U.S.C. 7311 which include: removal from office,
imprisonment, and a fine.
Executive Order 10450 specifies a violation of 5 U.S.C. 7311
for any person taking the oath of office to advocate “the
alteration of the form of the government of the United States
by unconstitutional means"
The definition of “advocate” is further specified in Executive
Order 10450 which for purposes of enforcement supplements 5
According to Executive Order 10450 (and therefore 5 U.S. 7311)
any act taken by government officials who have taken the oath
of office prescribed by 5 U.S.C. 3331 which alters the form of
government other than by amendment, is a criminal violation of
the 5 U.S.C. 7311. Such alteration without amendment is
criminal violation of 5 U.S.C. 7311 and 18 U.S.C. 1918.