The American Lawful and Peaceful Revolution

There are three keys of action to our lawful and peaceful revolution.  The first is our agreement upon prime constitutional intent, the second key is that we have a method to make and record such agreement upon that intent. The third key of action is the lawful process of the agreement itself.

There are two elements of agreement for prime constitutional intent "We the People" must make that are the foundation of our lawful and peaceful revolution.  ONE is that we have the right to alter or abolish, the SECOND is that free speech has the ultimate purpose of enabling the unity required to effectively alter or abolish.  And, inherent to those two is that these are the most prime constitutional intents of our framing documents.  They protect all other rights.

This proposal is founded in historical precedent and that is the last key of action, the legal process that we use to actually alter or abolish.  The process begins informally between "the people" with inquiry amongst them focusing on prime constitutional intent.

FIRST INQUIRY OF AGREEMENT
As a Citizen of a state of the united states for America, do you understand, agree and accept then DECLARE it is constitutional intent that the framers of the founding documents intended for us to alter or abolish government destructive to our unalienable rights?


SECOND INQUIRY OF AGREEMENT
As a Citizen of a state of the united states for America, do you understand, agree, accept then DECLARE it is constitutional intent that the ultimate purpose of free speech be to enable the unity adequate to effectively alter or abolish government destructive to our unalienable rights?


No unity has been possible with the corporate control over media.  Therein is the biggest problem, but this is about changing that.

Within the second key of action is agreement upon law that we MUST use the 9th amendment and that we do have rights that are not written in the constitution.

Ninth Amendment - U.S. Constitution
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

What is said here is that there are nearly an infinite number of rights we can think of that ARE RETAINED by us, the people, if we can agree upon them.  That is the catch, "the people" refers to basically a unified mass of some proportion approaching a majority. 
We have a catch 22 here.  We cannot share these facts of the law of the land until we have control over the law of the land which can be made to require and then enable the sharing of these facts that perpetuate the constitution.

However, it is possible.  We must keep a saying in mind.  

"If we always do what we've always done we'll always get what we've always got."

Yea, I know there are cognitive distortions of "all or nothing thinking" there, but in some cases such distortions are true.  And, there is good reason to believe this is one of them.  Meaning we have to go out of our way to share these agreements and spoken understanding of this process which is NOT complicated.  and also not very far out of our way.  Any discussion of politics and the state of our nation can carry this information with perfect context. 

One thing is sure, "politics as usual" promise to keep things as they've always been.

The right we retained that is needed now is the right to prepare for Article V.  Many people are afraid of Article V because the state and federal governments are in control so could runaway with it, IF we are not prepared to control it, or them.  An important right contained in Article V is the right that all amendments have constitutional intent.  AND, there is the distinct possibility that major corporations are colluding to HIJACK Article V, ignoring its intent!  Accordingly, this page and its strategy may become vital constitutional defense.

Article 5
The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.

Most critical here, is that "The People" are the only entity that can define constitutional intent, congress, the court and state legislators can only interpret it.  This is related to the 9th amendment.  In all, the undefined right of the ultimate purpose of free speech and that of the right to prepare to assure all amendments have constitutional intent, is the heart of this strategy to perpetuate the constitution.  And, such a notion is supremely constitutional in itself.

In summary:
We agree upon the ultimate purpose of free speech, and to use the 9th amendment to formally define that right through Article V, and that we have the right to use Article V itself to prepare and assure all amendments have constitutional intent.

The process.  The People With Law, Purify Politics.
How we do this.

Firstly, the agreement upon the purpose of free speech must be widely spread.  To do that, the people reading must  realize that this can be done within their normal, daily lives and be a part of the political activities if they have them, but, in itself, is NOT politics.  Things are getting desperate here in America and there is good reason to unify upon something different.  Even those that are apolitical can see this and this activity is not actually political, it is the root of lawfullness.   This costs us nothing and is a good exercise creating respect for the function of free speech.

After a degree of agreement is reached, I recommend ONE online petition be started where people sign and provide the state they are from, then we can embark on this phase of activism which essentially purifies our state legislatures, who also, cannot by law define constitutional intent, so MUST by law take our direction and definition of constitutional intent IF we are to manifest that all amendments "shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as part of this Constitution" as Article V defines.

A) Test legislators (all officials and candidates) for acceptance of the root purpose of free speech as being to assure information vital to unity needed to alter or abolish is shared and understood.

B) Test
legislators (all officials and candidates) for acceptance of the root purpose of free speech as prime constitutional intent used to create unity to conduct Article V with constitutional intent for the purpose of protecting unalienable rights.

C) As an official of government, can you accept that EVERY American can understand and accept A as the people have agreed and accepted, has the right under the 9th amendment to define A?

D) Are you aware that in 1911, 2/3 of the states applied for a convention and congress violated the law, their oath and the constitution by failing to convene delegates and that this continues today?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fs7qIQ1VkEg

This document has links to the letter sent to the clerk of congress and other aspects related.

http://www.foavc.org/reference/file47.pdf

Can you accept that such a fact justifies that all delegates be elected in the states by the people of those states?

Because of that letter, the house finally adopts rule to count states applications for Article V.

http://www.examiner.com/article/u-s-...n-applications

However, congress refused to start counting applications occuring before the letter.  The speakers were sued.

http://www.foavc.org/reference/doc4.pdf

That suit, of course was denied.  Government is deeply unlawful.  These .pdf's by Bill Walker explain the developing status.

http://www.foavc.org/reference/file67.pdf

http://www.foavc.org/reference/file70.pdf

http://www.foavc.org/reference/file71.pdf

http://www.foavc.org/reference/file73.pdf

http://www.foavc.org/reference/file74.pdf

http://www.foavc.org/reference/file75.pdf

National Archives and Records Administration Attempts Termination of Article V Convention

http://www.foavc.org/reference/file77.pdf

http://www.foavc.org/reference/file78.pdf
 
E) Can you understand and accept that any state legislator that cannot accept A), can be impeached in this constitutional emergency as being unfit for office because they are prepared to deprive citizens of their right to see all amendments at Article V have constitutional intent?

F) Can you understand and accept that under the 9th amendment A) B) C) D) E) all of which amount to legal process to defeat a recalcitrant congress in constitutional usurpation, and that IF citizens act with D) as justification for E) with 3/4 of the states to complete the legal process, they WILL be "the rightful masters of the congress and the courts" BECAUSE their states, as led by the people, then will agree as the people of the states have, that proper preparation for Article V is also a right under the 9th amendment if the people define it and it consists of;

1) Amending Article V to assure the right to "alter or abolish" is enforceable under law by including preparatory amendment as a requirement.

2) End the abridging of the PURPOSE of free speech.

3) Securing the vote.

4) Campaign finance reform.

G) Americans need to agree that Officials of states and federal government must accept that such preparation by amendment is completely constitutional and can only enable democratic assertion of the principles of the republic, and, once complete; WHEREUPON all amendment should cease until America can be certain, by testing itself using the purpose of free speech, that it is competent to Article V and can define constitutional intent.

That is literally the entire process.  It is LAW, not politics.  It does purify politics however.  Partisanship will return to parties working to express the will of our constitution republic either by strict interpretation of principle or by democratic determinations.


When Protesting At Congressional Or Federal Levels, These Laws Can Be Cited as Violated By Congress

They are also applicable to justification for state legislations to begin to assemble delegates for state conventions comprising an Article V convention.

Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order which further defines the law for purposes of enforcement. 5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office congressional members were required to take before assuming office.

5 U.S.C. 3333 required officials to sign an affidavit that they took the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not nor will violate that oath during your tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law,

5 U.S.C. 7311, which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense for anyone employed in the United States Government to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government.”, Do not accept that small violations do not matter. It is the accumulations of these violations spread over much of federal government that has compromised our nation.

18 U.S.C. 1918 provides penalties for violation of oath office described in 5 U.S.C. 7311 which include: removal from office, imprisonment, and a fine.

Executive Order 10450 specifies a violation of 5 U.S.C. 7311 for any person taking the oath of office to advocate “the alteration of the form of the government of the United States by unconstitutional means"

The definition of “advocate” is further specified in Executive Order 10450 which for purposes of enforcement supplements 5 U.S.C. 7311.

According to Executive Order 10450 (and therefore 5 U.S. 7311) any act taken by government officials who have taken the oath of office prescribed by 5 U.S.C. 3331 which alters the form of government other than by amendment, is a criminal violation of the 5 U.S.C. 7311. Such alteration without amendment is criminal violation of 5 U.S.C. 7311 and 18 U.S.C. 1918.
Back To Law

Back To Algoxy